By Achadu Gabriel, Kaduna
First Bank of Nigeria (FBN) Plc is under intense pressure to release the account of Shareholders of Eleme Petrochemical Co-operatives Investment and Credit Society (EPCICS) limited in line with Court order.
The EPCICS is accusing the FBN and Economic Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) of total diregard to court order which granted them access to their account with the First Bank.
The Society, in a document obtained in kaduna, is also acccued EFCC of harassment, intimidation and infringement on the rights of the members of the society by denying them access to their funds trapped in FBN, describing the commission’s action as contrary to the subsisting court order.
Justice Evelyn Maha of federal high court Abuja, had on January 15, 2021 ordered that the restriction placed on the account of the co-operatives society with first bank be lifted but the Bank refused to obey the order, citing counter-directive from the EFCC.
Despite the court order, the bank is demanding that the society signed an indemnity against claims by the EFCC before oblidging the cooperatives society an honour to access her account, an action adjuged to be contrary to the contract between a bank and its customer and against all extant rules of banking.
The co-operatives society said it had written the First Bank seeking explanation on whether there was any superior court order served on the bank by the EFCC, restricting it from honouring its obligations to the cooperatives society.
According to the Society, the bank has not produced any such order but was only referring to a counter-directive and alleged mere harassment from EFCC, with Impunity.
The society also alleged that EFCC had sort to pervert the course of justice from the beginning, having supported by joining the co-operatives society in a suit to enforce the fundamental rights of the shareholders of the group.
“But EFCC surreptitiously went behind to another court of co-ordinate jurisdiction to obtained an order freezing the account of the society, an attempt that however failed as the court granted an order lifting the interim restriction on the said account after it discovered that EFCC obtained the order in error.
According to the society the First Bank continues ignominy is in flagrant disregard to the court order as EFCC had filed an appeal against the order lifting the restriction placed on the shareholders’ bank account even without an order on stay of execution granted EFCC.
EFCC noted from reports and judgments that the court confirmed that the initial members of staff of Indoroma Eleme Petrochemicals Ltd, Port Harcourt, Rivers State before its privatisation are the members of the cooperatives society.
Recalled that in 2009, the federal government through the National Council on Privatisation had approved the sale of 10% of its equity shares in Indorama Eleme Petrochemicals Ltd to the host community and interested staff of the company.
“The 10% equity shares was shared as 7.5% allotted to the host community while the remaining 2.5% was allotted to the staff of Indoroma Eleme Petrochemicals, who came together under Eleme Petrochemical Co-operatives Society in compliance with the federal government’s directive that a special purpose vehicle be formed where all members will belong to enable them buy the shares at the time.
“Problem started in 2013 when 10 members of staff who initially subscribed to the purchase of the 2.5% equity shares had their jobs terminated from the employment of the company.
“Indoroma Petrochemicals since then began a legal battle as to whether the laid-off staff can continue to enjoy dividends since they are not longer staff in the company and in so doing sought to replace the laid-off staff with new recruited staff.
“When the shareholding claims became an issue, the laid-of staff approached the River State Ministry of Commerce and Industry to arbitrate between them and the company, and the Ministry gave an arbitral award in favour of the former members of staff and consequently the exited staff of the co-operatives society approached the Federal High Court to enforce the arbitral award and as required by law it was granted and the award became a judgment of the court.
“But the newly recruited staff being allegedly instigated by the company, approached the National Industrial Court, stating that the arbitral award was illegally procured but the industrial court in striking out the case stated that it can not sit on an appeal over a matter that has been decided by a court of co-ordinate jurisdiction.