Synopsis: Oracle Financial Services Software consistently earns much higher margins than TCS and Infosys because it is a product-led business built around standardised banking platforms. Deep customer lock-in, predictable recurring revenue, limited customisation, and strong support from Oracle’s global ecosystem give it durable pricing power and superior profitability over time.
In India’s IT sector, companies like TCS and Infosys are often seen as the benchmarks for scale and profitability. Yet, there is a much smaller player that quietly earns far higher margins year after year. While most large IT firms rely on manpower-driven services, this company has built its business in a very different way. What makes Oracle Financial Services Software so structurally profitable that it consistently outperforms even the biggest names in Indian IT?
Oracle Financial Services Software Limited provides technology solutions to banks and other financial institutions across the world. Its products are designed to support core banking operations and help institutions improve how they serve customers, manage risks, and run their day-to-day businesses more efficiently. The company focuses on building systems that allow financial institutions to operate with greater speed, flexibility, and reliability in a highly regulated environment.
The company’s business is largely driven by its products segment, which offers a wide range of software solutions covering digital banking, analytics, and back-end operations. Oracle Financial Services Software continues to invest heavily in research and development to strengthen its product capabilities and stay relevant as banking technology evolves. These efforts have resulted in software platforms that are used by banks in more than 150 countries for critical and mission-important functions. The shares are priced at Rs. 7,260 with a market capitalization of Rs. 6185.02 crore.
What Are The Reasons For The High Margins?
Over the past five years, Oracle Financial Services Software has consistently delivered much higher operating margins than India’s largest IT services companies. Its margins have generally remained in a strong range of about 43 percent to 50 percent. In comparison, TCS has operated with margins of roughly 26 percent to 28 percent during the same period, while Infosys has ranged between about 24 percent and 28 percent. This clear gap in profitability raises an important question: how does a relatively smaller company manage to outperform giants like TCS and Infosys on margins year after year?
Product Company Vs Services Company
At the heart of Oracle Financial Services Software’s superior margins is a simple but often overlooked distinction: it is fundamentally a product company, while most large Indian IT firms are services-led. Companies like TCS and Infosys grow their revenue primarily by adding more people to deliver IT services, manage projects, and support client operations. In this model, revenue expansion is closely linked to headcount growth, and margins are naturally capped by employee costs.
Oracle Financial Services Software operates very differently. Its revenue is driven largely by software licenses, annual renewals, and upgrades to existing platforms. In Q3FY26, nearly 90 percent of OFSS’s revenue came from products, with services contributing only about 10 percent. This contrasts sharply with peers. At TCS, software products and SaaS platforms generated around USD 3 billion in 2021, accounting for just 12 to 15 percent of total revenue. Infosys is even more services-heavy, with products and platforms contributing only about 4 percent of revenue in Q3FY26.
The margin impact of this difference is significant. Once a product is developed and the core R&D costs are absorbed, selling the same software to another bank or geography involves minimal incremental cost. As a result, additional revenue at OFSS carries much higher contribution margins. This ability to scale without proportionate cost increases is a key reason why its profitability consistently stands apart from the broader Indian IT sector.
Deep Customer Lock-In: Why Banks Don’t Bargain Hard
At the core of Oracle Financial Services Software’s pricing power is the role its products play inside a bank’s operations. Core banking software is not a peripheral system that can be swapped easily. It sits at the heart of a bank, handling deposits, loans, payments, compliance reporting, and customer data. Any attempt to replace such systems involves significant risks around data migration, regulatory approvals, and operational downtime, making banks extremely cautious about switching vendors once a platform is in place.
This deep integration creates strong customer lock-in. According to SDK.Finance, around 10 percent of the world’s banked population has an account powered by Oracle FLEXCUBE, with more than 600 financial institutions using the platform across over 140 countries.
The breadth of this installed base highlights both the regulatory complexity Oracle has already navigated and the scale at which its systems operate. For banks, the cost and risk of moving away often far outweigh the cost of continuing with the same vendor.
The strength of these relationships was visible in Q3FY26, when multiple global banks chose to either adopt Oracle’s core banking platforms or extend existing contracts. Banks across Malaysia, Mexico, Kuwait, Nigeria, the US, and the UK placed new licenses or renewed subscriptions for Oracle’s analytical and core banking applications. Such repeat wins and long-term extensions reflect low customer churn, limited price sensitivity, and a steady stream of annuity-style revenue, all of which support Oracle Financial Services Software’s consistently high margins.
Limited Customisation, High Standardisation
Indian IT companies largely operate on a custom-build model where each client defines the problem, scope, and requirements. This means every project tends to be different, requiring long discussions, multiple rounds of changes, and continuous adjustments. Pricing is often based on time and effort, which can lead to scope expansion, delays, and higher costs. Because of this, margins in traditional IT services can fluctuate widely depending on how well a project is estimated and executed.
Oracle Financial Services Software takes a very different approach. Instead of building unique solutions for every bank, it offers largely standardised platforms with limited and controlled customisation. The company defines what its software does, sets clear boundaries, and prices it in a structured way. Delivery follows a well-defined playbook rather than ad-hoc problem solving. This makes implementation faster, more predictable, and less prone to cost overruns.
Standardisation also changes how teams are deployed. Rather than relying heavily on senior engineers for every client, OFSS can use more junior resources for routine work while senior experts focus only on complex cases. This improves efficiency and scalability. Instead of growing linearly with headcount, the business can serve more clients using the same processes and systems.
By reducing uncertainty, rework, and project risk, OFSS avoids the margin erosion that often affects custom IT services firms. In effect, “standardisation ensures that revenue growth does not come at the expense of profitability.”
The Oracle Parent Advantage
Oracle Financial Services Software’s biggest structural advantage comes from being closely tied to Oracle, one of the world’s largest enterprise software companies. The business originally started as part of Citigroup’s software arm and was later spun off in 1992 as Citicorp Information Technology Industries Ltd., which became i-flex Solutions. Citigroup initially invested about USD 400,000 as seed funding, and the company built its early business by selling its Microbanker software before developing FLEXCUBE, which became a global success in the early 2000s.
Oracle began increasing its ownership in i-flex in 2005, buying a 41 percent stake for about USD 593 million. Over 2006, Oracle added another 7.52 percent and later 3.2 percent through open-market purchases. By January 2007, after an open offer to minority shareholders, Oracle’s holding had risen to around 83 percent. In August 2006, the company also acquired the US-based compliance software firm Mantas for USD 122.6 million, partly funded through a preferential share allotment to Oracle. In April 2008, i-flex was formally renamed Oracle Financial Services Software Limited and became a core part of Oracle’s Financial Services Global Industry Unit.
Being part of Oracle gives OFSS access to a powerful global sales network that most Indian IT firms do not have. Large banks already use Oracle databases and cloud systems, which makes it easier for OFSS to sell its banking products. The Oracle brand also carries credibility in regulated markets, reducing resistance from bank management and regulators. Because OFSS products are tightly integrated with Oracle’s technology stack, implementation is smoother and cross-selling becomes easier.
From a margin perspective, this parent advantage lowers customer acquisition costs and strengthens pricing power. Instead of competing only on price, OFSS benefits from long-term enterprise relationships where trust, compatibility, and stability matter more. This helps the company expand globally while protecting its profitability.
Oracle Financial Services Software’s superior margins are not the result of short-term cost control or one-off successes. They are built into the way the business is designed. Unlike traditional Indian IT services firms that depend on people-intensive projects, OFSS runs on a product-led model that scales efficiently, keeps costs predictable, and delivers recurring revenue.
Deep customer lock-in, limited customisation, and the backing of Oracle’s global ecosystem further strengthen its pricing power and reduce business risk. Together, these factors create a structural advantage that allows the company to consistently earn far higher margins than peers like TCS and Infosys.
Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by investment experts/broking houses/rating agencies on tradebrains.in are their own, and not that of the website or its management. Investing in equities poses a risk of financial losses. Investors must therefore exercise due caution while investing or trading in stocks. Trade Brains Technologies Private Limited or the author are not liable for any losses caused as a result of the decision based on this article. Please consult your investment advisor before investing.
