2 min readUpdated: Jul 27, 2026 04:08 PM IST
2020 riots IB Officer murder case: The Delhi Police demanded the death penalty for all convicts before a Delhi court. It stated stated that the nature of the crime was heinous and brutal and that it was a cold-blooded murder.
Six years after Intelligence Bureau staffer Ankit Sharma (26) was killed during the 2020 Northeast Delhi riots, a Delhi court on July 13 convicted former Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Councillor Tahir Hussain and four others in the case.
Hussain, who was suspended by the AAP soon after the incident, has been convicted of murder and rioting, among other charges. He was, however, acquitted of the criminal conspiracy charge.
Delhi Police said that this is a case where the criminals turned into animals. Delhi Police stated that Ankit Sharma was brutally tortured. There were 51 injuries, 7 of which were fatal on their own, and 16 were inflicted with sharp-edged weapons. The choice of weapons demonstrates the nature of the crime, they argued.
On the other hand, Tahir Hussain’s counsel opposed the demand for death penalty. They stated that death penalty should only be given in the rarest of rare cases.
Tahir Hussain’s counsel said that the punishment of death cannot be determined merely on the basis of the injuries sustained. They also cited the good conduct of Hussain
Tahir Hussain counsel stated that the provision for the death penalty does not apply to every case. The court had recorded the statements of 91 witnesses, after which only 6 out of 11 accused were convicted by the court.
Story continues below this ad
Tahir Hussain’s counsel said that throughout the entire trial, no evidence of criminal conspiracy (under IPC Section 120B) was presented before the court.
Tahir Hussain’s counsel said that the police themselves were unable to control the violent mob, and in such a situation, a single individual cannot be held responsible for the murder.
Stay updated with the latest – Click here to follow us on Instagram



